Small quakes, big impact: lessons learned from Christchurch

Could a small aftershock in a city not considered an earthquake hotspot trigger one of the largest insurance losses ever? We answer these questions in the publication Small quakes, big impact: lessons learned from Christchurch.

The massive, and unexpected, insurance costs connected to the series of earthquakes that hit New Zealand's Christchurch region in 2010 and 2011 exposed blind spots in current views of financial earthquake risk. Estimates for the total economic costs continue to rise, with current insurance cost estimates for the 22 February 2011 6.3 magnitude (M) aftershock alone standing at USD 17.2bn – more than double the initial (risk model based) estimates.

Though the quakes were moderate in size and happened in an area not considered high risk, the only higher earthquake-related insurance losses over the last 50 years were the 9.0M Tohoku earthquake in Japan in 2011 and the 6.7M earthquake in Northridge (California, US) in 1994.

So, what happened in Christchurch?

As explained in the new Swiss Re publication Small quakes, big impact: lessons learned from Christchurch, several factors contributed to the higher-than-expected claims. These include difficulties in processing the huge number of claims, challenges in allocating losses to individual earthquake events, costly upgrades resulting from strengthened building codes, and special features of the policy wordings, such as unlimited replacement values. Many of these factors are not adequately considered by current risk assessment methods and the publication aims to increase awareness of this with direct insurers.

Could this happen again?

Given that a similar sized earthquake can occur virtually anywhere, it is vital that we learn from the Christchurch experience and address any protection gaps. Using Sydney, Singapore and Vancouver as examples, Small quakes, big impact: lessons learned from Christchurch highlights that the circumstances leading to high costs in Christchurch could almost certainly materialize elsewhere. Learning from the experience in Christchurch provides an opportunity to address current risk assessment gaps and prevent small quakes from producing chart-topping losses.

Published 11 May 2015


Managing climate and natural disaster...

Re/insurance plays an important role in managing climate and natural disaster risk, and that's why it's part of Swiss Re's core business.

Read the whole story

Volcanoes – potential disasters...

The volcanic ash clouds of the 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland cancelled 107 000 flights, stranded 10 million passengers and cost the airline industry alone USD 1.7 billion. But what if...

Read the whole story


Write a comment

Comment Policy
(All fields marked with * are mandatory)

In our ongoing efforts to improve the quality and relevance of our publications, we would like to know more about you.

*mandatory

Interested in subscribing to our content? Visit our subscription page

Remember me

We use cookies to gather information that will help us provide the best possible service. By using this site, you are accepting our cookie policy.

In our ongoing efforts to improve the quality and relevance of our publications, we would like to know more about you.

* required fields

Interested in subscribing to our content? Visit our subscription page.

Close
Close

Show local contact for:

SWITCHBOARD

  • Zurich +41 43 285 2121
  • MUNICH+49 89 3844 0
  • HONG KONG+852 2827 4345
  • LONDON+44 20 7933 3000
  • ARMONK+1 914 828 8000
Show Location

Subscribe to Newsletters

Subscribe to Newsletters